A rigged map would be a map that is in favour of one player. As Yankee said, the triggers benefited all users, not just Niort1. Now I understand it can be argued that this is still unfair, we don't know if Niort was even aware of these triggers himself - he could be, he could not, and I guess there's no way of infallibly proving either point. If, however, you would like to propose he is a cheater simply because he has hosted this map, then I am afraid that I will have to add everybody I have ever seen host v14, and anybody I have seen host v14 in the past. I can immediately think of BonnieParker, furious_purpose and blackfox1, all of which should be added. I don't know about anyone else, but to me your preposition seems ridiculous.
Oh and egy advancing faster than norse (loki in this case), really just nullifies the fact that more than 5 siege speed is not a hax aswell.
Has it once entered your stream of consciousness that he may have advanced before you because he is a better player than you? Please broaden your mind and stop being hindered by self-adoration. As I believe Yankee just clarified, having more than 5 siege speed is neither a 'hax' or a hack. It is a trigger. There is a difference, so please treat them separately.
Lawrencius wrote:
And speaking of irony, I laugh at these futile attempts as Gentleman Mittyho is trying to "outmature" the older people in topics where he doesn't belong.
I am not intentionally trying to be a "gentleman", although even if I was I would not be offended by this accusation - being a gentleman is certainly not something which I would frown upon. I will take your accusation of "gentleman" as accusing me of snobbery: think that if you will, but I just like to write half-coherently. I don't try to "outmature" anybody, although obviously I do "outmature" (please note this isn't a real word) yourself. Unfortunately you seem to be incapable of any form of politeness or formality. I understand that your mind will immediately stray to the tedious comment "dis is da int3rw3bz", but being on the internet does not mean that I will try to write like I am disabled. It's interesting that you say I am posting in topics "where i dont belong". In one topic, you say it is pretentious of me not to reply to more topics, but here you say that I reply where I shouldn't be. Your opinions are vastly conflicting and bordering even closer to incoherency.
The entire point of saying you suck dick, is cause the horrible subjective mess you type, jesus christ. "Cause Hades says he found out about his friend hacking and listed him", or so you say, yeah idgaf about some other instance where someone cheated, if that cunt got reported in this list then that is his fault and not matter of this subject.
I understand the point of the sexual references, I just wanted to highlight how ridiculous the constant sexual connotations are. I understand this may be funny to people who have not yet reached puberty or to those that have a diminutive sense of humour, but I'm afraid that I personally do not see the underlying wit. I don't understand the "so you say" in your comment - just go to page 1 or 2 and read it for yourself, and then your vague suspicion will be proven to be in vain. I do however appreciate your constructive criticism; I will try not to write "horrible subjective mess you type, jesus christ", although I am not sure what to do about the Jesus comment, for it has left me bewildered.
Go troll on UCA some more, and piss off with protecting your gaybuddies in these serious discussions that they don't deserve.
I will consider your request for me to troll on the UCA some more, but I think that I will inevitably decline, sorry, but I do not want to "piss off" right now. Using the word "gay" as an insult is somewhat outdated, as I don't consider a) the word gay or b) referring to me as a homosexual to be offensive. Please update your arguments with more modern insults, for this will provoke a more emotional response from me, thus fulfilling your aim.
You seem somewhat irritable, Lawrenicus. Please do not be offended because somebody has decided to retort to one of your offhand comments/general idiocy. After all, who doesn't love a bit of confrontation? Perhaps if you calmed down you could write a coherent argument that wasn't torn to pieces in 36 minutes.